Psak 5769 Nisan 1 Appendix A - Revision history

Glevy25 at 12:20, 29 October 2009

2009-10-29T12:20:53Z

Binyomin at 08:11, 14 May 2009

2009-05-14T08:11:14Z

Binyomin at 09:34, 29 April 2009

2009-04-29T09:34:31Z

Binyomin at 09:34, 29 April 2009

2009-04-29T09:34:06Z

Binyomin at 12:48, 14 April 2009

2009-04-14T12:48:05Z

Binyomin at 12:47, 14 April 2009

2009-04-14T12:47:51Z

Binyomin: /* External links */

2009-04-14T12:45:58Z

‎External links

Binyomin: /* See also */

2009-04-14T12:45:00Z

‎See also

Binyomin at 12:44, 14 April 2009

2009-04-14T12:44:24Z

Binyomin at 12:43, 14 April 2009

2009-04-14T12:43:55Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 :''While the nascent Sanhedrin has not attempted to ascertain the veracity of any of these claims, it did see fit to reiterate the halachic position forbidding the transfer of national, religious, and spiritual assets to foreign sovereignty.  The court also pointed out the illegality, illegitimacy and potentially disastrous results of the efforts of those both inside the government and outside it which appear to be doing so.'' - Webmaster
-'''The direction of religious policy of the Vatican.'''
+'''The direction of the religious policy of the Vatican.'''
 Summary of issues presented by Dr. Daisy Stern
-Starting with the founding of the state, 61 year ago, it can be seen that in reality the Church never accepted the fact that the State of Israel had sovereignty over Jerusalem and its religious assets. This is true in both a political sense and especially in a theological sense.
+Starting with the founding of the state, 61 year ago, the Church has seen as an unacceptable fact that the State of Israel is the sovereign of Jerusalem, and its religious properties, from a political perspective, but mainly in from a theological perspective, and this is not the place to expand on this matter.
-TRANSLATION IN PROGRESS
+This reality became more intense 41 years ago in the wake of the Six Day War, and after the formal application of Israeli sovereignty on all of Greater Jerusalem.  As a historical reminder, we shall note the visit of Pope Paul the Sixth in the "Holy Land" in 1963, in which he completely disregarded the sovereignty of Israel and its government.
-The more so is the reality 41 years ago following the Six Day War and after application of Israeli sovereignty - formally the Greater Jerusalem there any mention of historical enough if we'll list the visit of Pope Paul 6 "Holy Land" in 1963 where he ignored all recognize Israeli sovereignty government.
+At the beginning of the 1990's, the Church's policy of opening of dialogue with the World Jewish Congress was strengthened, as an extension of the challenge of Bronfman for normalization of ties between the Church and the Jewish People.  These relations being opened, a dialogue began between the Church and the government of Israel.  The Foreign Ministry, headed by Shimon Peres and his deputy Yossi Beilin, held talks and arrived at certain classified agreements, about which the Israeli public does not have clear data, except from leaks.  In parallel to the secret channels, there have been political talks since then with the Church for the normalization of relations with the Jewish Nation and with the State of Israel - a matter from which it is expected that the Church, with its great influence on its community of believers, will reduce the hate and the anti-Semitism towards the Jewish Nation and to the State of Israel.
-At the beginning of the 90 increase in the policy of the church opening a dialogue with the World Jewish Congress, Bronfman challenge below normalization of relations between the Church and the Jewish people. This system ties Hioth lead began to talk in between the church and the Government of Israel. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, headed by Shimon Peres and Yossi Beilin וסגנו calls reached agreement on certain classified information to the Israeli public that there is clear but Mhdlfot. At the same time, since the channel is secret dialogue with the church normalization of relations with the Jewish people and Israel - which are the expectations from the church the great influence on the public believes Itzmtzmm the hatred of anti-Semitism against the Jewish people and Israel.
+On the opposing side, the Church, in a systematic way, expects from the State of Israel recognition of its ownership and rulership hold on religious institutions and churches in Jerusalem and throughout the state. (For example, on Mount Zion, and in Kfar Nachum by the Sea of the Galilee)  As an expression of this recognition, as an action that comes out from this demand, is to cancel payments of municipal taxes that the Church owes to the institutions of the State.
-The other hand - the church systematically expect the State of Israel recognize its own authorities to hold the church in Jerusalem, religious institutions across the country [such as Mount Zion in the village of Nahum the language of the Sea of Galilee]. Expression, which is a result this requirement is, to cancel the property tax payments to the state church must.
+In the last few years, with the rise to power of Ehud Olmert, the talks went made much positive advancement, as far as the Church is concerned, and a continuous dialogue has been conducted between the sides with a goal of completion before the visit of the Pope in the near future.  The Church does not hide its intention to bring about the internationalization of Jerusalem.  As an interim step, it strives to create governmental control in its "religious properties", but its goal first and foremost is to remove control of Jerusalem from the State of Israel and to move it to the international control of the U.N., that without a doubt could bring the Church's stamp in a much more realistic way on all of Jerusalem.
-In recent years, with עלייתו government of Ehud Olmert talks came on the very positive stripes - Measurement of the church, and is managed two - regular dialogue between the sides of the trend towards the complete visit of the Pope during the near, the Church does not hides the Mgmth bring Lbinaum Jerusalem. Hotrt intermediate step is to hold the authorities to "religious properties," but the main trend is to remove capital from the state to rule in Jerusalem and led by internationally - the United Nations certainly way you can weave the wire seal Shitbio church in a more concrete on the whole of Jerusalem.
+Recently, the outgoing Prime Minister, Mr. Ehud Olmert, made statements in line with the above when he announced that he offered the Palestinians, in the framework of a solution to the problems between Israel and the Palestinian Authority in the matter of Jerusalem, to transfer the ownership of Jerusalem to an international entity headed by the U.N.
-Latest התבטא while outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to declare these things in the spirit offered as part of a solution to Palestinian problems between Israel, headed by the Palestinian Jerusalem to take over the ownership of Jerusalem, headed by the UN International unparsed entity.
+In light of this, action should be taken to reveal and prevent these plans by the new government of Israel, headed by Mr. Binyamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Leiberman, who are faithful to full Jewish control of Jerusalem, and to refrain from approving any document that grants the Church any hold in Jerusalem.
-In light of this reality has to do an act and expose thwart these trends by the new Israeli government headed by Mr. Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Mr. Avigdor Lieberman, of trust on the rule of Jewish Jerusalem and avoid full Mlasr each document Hmkna hold any church in Jerusalem.
+The day before the end of the (outgoing) government, there was a meeting between people from the Foreign Ministry and the Vatican, as preparation for the Pope's visit.  It should be investigated if there was any advancement towards a signing (of an agreement).
-The day before the end of government was a meeting between people from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Boatikan. - Preparing to visit the pope. Please check whether the signature קידמו?
+Aharon Abramovitch, an authority from the Foreign Ministry, and Shmuel ben Shmuel and Bahid Mantzur were in Rome.  It should be clarified what was signed between them in secrecy.
-Aaron Abramovich - contact on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Shmuel Ben Shmuel מנצור hand were in Rome. Have to find out what was signed between them secretly.
+There are rumors that on July 4th there will be a meeting between the Vatican and the Foreign Minister (from Catholic newspapers in Italy), which will be to discuss the continuation of the process and signing of documents.
-There are rumors again - 7 / 4 Hutikan will be a meeting between Minister of Foreign Affairs (Katoliim newspapers in Italy), handlebar agreements executed by the process below.
+Ms. Dr. Daisy Stern has labored greatly, and in her efforts she has gathered together the attached documents for this summary, that by them the Church's policy in this matter can be seen as above.
 ==See also==
@@ Line 57: / Line 55: @@
 [[Category:Legal rulings and opinions to date]]
 [[Category:Special Court for Matters Concerning the Nation and the State]]
 [[he:פסק תשס"ט בניסן א' נספח א']]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 [[Category:Legal rulings and opinions to date]]
 [[Category:Special Court for Matters Concerning the Nation and the State]]
-[[Category:Translation in Progress]]
+[[Category:Translation in progress]]
 [[he:פסק תשס"ט בניסן א' נספח א']]

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 More information can be obtained by writing Dr. Daisy Stern or the Secretary of the nascent Sanhedrin.
 [[Category:Translation in Progress]]
 [[he:פסק תשס"ט בניסן א' נספח א']]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 29 April 2009
Line 58:		Line 58:
	[[Category:Special Court for Matters Concerning the Nation and the State]]		[[Category:Special Court for Matters Concerning the Nation and the State]]
	[[Category:Legal rulings and opinions to date]]		[[Category:Legal rulings and opinions to date]]
		+
		+	[[he:פסק תשס"ט בניסן א' נספח א']]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 14 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	'''The direction of religious policy of the Vatican.'''		'''The direction of religious policy of the Vatican.'''
		+
	Summary of issues presented by Dr. Daisy Stern		Summary of issues presented by Dr. Daisy Stern

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 14 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	'''The direction of religious policy of the Vatican.'''		'''The direction of religious policy of the Vatican.'''
		+	Summary of issues presented by Dr. Daisy Stern

	Starting with the founding of the state, 61 year ago, it can be seen that in reality the Church never accepted the fact that the State of Israel had sovereignty over Jerusalem and its religious assets. This is true in both a political sense and especially in a theological sense.		Starting with the founding of the state, 61 year ago, it can be seen that in reality the Church never accepted the fact that the State of Israel had sovereignty over Jerusalem and its religious assets. This is true in both a political sense and especially in a theological sense.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 14 April 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:

	==External links==		==External links==
		+	Dr. Daisy Stern has provided as series of documents to the court. An informal review of this information follows:
		+
		+	The most relevant are these:

	* [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article577852.ece Vatican offers swap deal to regain site of Last Supper] (The Times Online - October 13, 2005)		* [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article577852.ece Vatican offers swap deal to regain site of Last Supper] (The Times Online - October 13, 2005)

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ==See also==
-* [http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2009/03/perfect-crime-vaticans-plot-to-rob-am_31.html
+* [http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2009/03/perfect-crime-vaticans-plot-to-rob-am_31.html Israel Truth Times]
 ==External links==

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Aaron Abramovich - contact on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Shmuel Ben Shmuel מנצור hand were in Rome. Have to find out what was signed between them secretly.
-* There are rumors again - 7 / 4 Hutikan will be a meeting between Minister of Foreign Affairs (Katoliim newspapers in Italy), handlebar agreements executed by the process below.
+There are rumors again - 7 / 4 Hutikan will be a meeting between Minister of Foreign Affairs (Katoliim newspapers in Italy), handlebar agreements executed by the process below.
 Mrs. Doctor Daisy Stern commission many efforts coordinated multiple documents attached to this summary, which Mtzteirt policy of the church in the spirit of things above.