
|
 
The idea behind the restoration of the
Great Court,
and the halachic foundations for operation
"It is the obligation
of Sanhedrin, in its capacity as the leadership of the nation, to unify
the entire Israelite nation in a single bond of unity. Just as the skin
unifies all parts of the flesh and covers them as one, so, too, must
the leaders endeavor with all their might to unify all parts of the
nation in a single union. Then, the Jewish nation will endure, they
will blossom and flower to the highest degree, and no adversary or
misfortune will befall them. But if the leaders do not attend to
unifying them as one, then they will cause the plague to burst forth in
the community and spread to themselves as well. They will lose their
influence over the people, undermine the foundation and everything will
dwindle... This actually occurred at that time. The absence of unity
among us caused damage, destruction and exile, and it continues to
prolong the exile... The leaders
will ultimately be held responsible for this due to their failure
to
try to unify the whole Israelite nation as one, though it is the only
cure for our malady, as Chazal say."
Harav Yisachar
Shlomo Teichtal, pre-war posek, Eim Habanim Semeicha 338-9
The current attempt to re-establish
the
Sanhedrin is generally referred to as the "nascent Sanhedrin", or the
"developing Sanhedrin". This is because the prevailing opinion of the
senior members of the Sanhedrin is that the Sanhedrin has not yet
achieved halachic [Jewish legal] status on par with its
previous position. It does however have the full
authority of a Rabbinical court, and is working diligently and with
much
discussion to satisfy all halachic requirements for complete
restoration as soon as possible. There is an enormous amount
of work left
to be done, so they humbly and urgently request scholars
to assist and participate as much as possible to help in overcoming
these
difficulties. This
is a unique opportunity that should not be wasted.
The spokesman said, "The
rebirth of the Sanhedrin is a slow, ongoing
process. Although it makes headlines and many like to highlight its
controversy, it is in truth a humble project by rabbis from all sides
of the Torah world joining together simply to fulfill a Torah
commandment. Rather than a source of religious division, G-d forbid, it
is a vehicle to bring about Jewish unity and civil justice, to help
repair some of the deepest rifts in our society, and to provide an
active, exemplary and unified Torah leadership so lacking in our
times."
The halachic foundation
The
Jewish legal system
consists of a large Sanhedrin of seventy one judges, small Sanhedrins
in
each city consisting of twenty three judges and numerous Basei din [law
courts] of three judges. The members the large and small Sanhedrins and
the Basei din (with the exception of monetary cases) must be semuchim.
Ideally, there should be a direct line of semichah from Moshe
Rabbenu ע"ה [Moses]. However, this line of semichah was
lost shortly after the last Sanhedrin ceased to function about 1500
years ago. Hence, the Basei din of recent times do not consist
of semuchim and are restricted to monetary cases. (This semichah should not be confused
with the examinations taken today in order to become a rabbi and are
also called semichah).
Maimonides records that it is an absolute, binding requirement of the
Jewish people to set up a Sanhedrin and Basei din, and he
gives insight into a method how to do this in our day. An attempt to re-establish
the Sanhedrin must be based on the re-establishment of semichah – Biblical
ordination, according the the
principles set out by Maimonides:
יא נראין
לי הדברים, שאם
הסכימו כל החכמים שבארץ ישראל למנות דיינין ולסמוך אותן--הרי אלו סמוכין,
ויש להן לדון דיני קנסות, ויש להן לסמוך לאחרים.
אם כן, למה היו
החכמים מצטערין על הסמיכה, כדי שלא ייבטלו דיני קנסות מישראל: לפי
שישראל מפוזרין, ואי אפשר שיסכימו כולן; ואם היה שם סמוך מפי סמוך, אינו
צריך דעת כולן, אלא דן דיני קנסות לכול, שהרי נסמך מפי בית דין.
והדבר צריך הכרע.
משנה תורה - ספר שופטים - הלכות סנהדרין פרק ד
It appears to me [Maimonides] that
if all the sages of Eretz Yisroel consent to appoint dayanim
and grant them semichah, they have the law of musmachim
and they can judge penalty cases and are authorized to
grant semichah to others [thus restoring Biblical
ordination].
If so, why did Chazal bemoan [the loss of] semichah? So that
the judgment of penalty cases
wouldn't disappear from among Israel because
Jews are so spread out that its not possible to get their consent [to
authorized a dayan]. If someone were to receive semichah
from someone who already has semichah, then he does not require their consent – he
may judge penalty cases for everyone since he received semichah from
beis din. However, this matter requires a final
decision.
(Rambam, Hilchos Sanhedrin 4:11)
Renewing semichah requires
the consent of the Rabbis in Israel to somech one
person. This person can then somech others. After semichah
has been granted to seventy one worthy Rabbonim, a
Sanhedrin can be formed. All this must take
place in Israel. In a "final
decision", Rabbi Yosef Karo,
author of the Shulchan Aruch, recorded as definitive halacha that
semichah can be renewed by consensus (Choshen Mishpat 295).
The first attempt using this method to reintroduce semichah was
made in
1538 by Rabbi Yaakov Beirav of Safed. Rabbi Yosef Karo is
known to have received semichah from Rabbi Beirav, and used
his semichah to ordain Rabbi Moses Alsheich, who in
turn, ordained Rabbi Chaim Vital. Thus the first "semichah by
consensus" can be traced for at least four
generations, but no
Sanhedrin was formed because some Rabbis including the Ralbach (Rabbi
Levy Chaviv) objected due to a perceived slight on the honor of the
Rabbis of Jerusalem. There have been at least four other
orthodox attempts since that time in 1830, 1901, 1940 and 1949.
The process of re-establishment
|
Rav
Moshe
Halberstam, ��"�
|
Rabbi Dov Levanoni
explained
the steps leading up to the most recent attempt to renew the
institution of semichah in 2004, through a consensus of
hundreds
of the most influential and scholarly Rabbis living
in the Land of Israel. While
Rabbi Yaakov Beirav and
Rabbi Yosef Karo laid an excellent halachic foundation for
understanding this teaching of Maimonides, the
current attempt to re-establish the
Jewish Sanhedrin has tried to learn from previous attempts and avoid
some of
the pitfalls. For example, to avoid claims that not all the
rabbis of Israel were aware of the latest attempt to set up the
Sanhedrin, an initial
enormous expenditure was spent on a
publicity campaign of the upcoming semichah process, 50,000
copies of a detailed flier were distributed among 4,500 Jewish centers
in Israel, outlining that a vote of a first samuch was going
to be held, along with contact information of the Va'ad ha-Mechonen
la-Sanhedrin. Not long afterwards, seven hundred leading Rabbonim
were contacted either in person or by written letter. R' Levanoni
explained that Rabbi Moshe
Halberstam, a senior Rabbi on Jerusalem's Eda Hareidis, became
the
first samuch after receiving approval by
Israel's leading Rabbis – those followed by most of Israel's religious
Jews – and there were no objections from the hundreds of Rabbis
consulted via written letters.
Leading sages have supported the semichah directly,
indirectly or abstained. Rabbi Shalom Elyashiv, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef,
Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg and many others gave their blessing but
did not join the Sanhedrin. The son of Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu is one of
the rabbis ordained. Rabbi Avraham Shapiro abstained on the issue but
also refused to discourage it. Rabbi Tzvi Eidan, the author of Asot
Mishpat (which describes how it is possible to reestablish the
Sanhedrin) was appointed as first interim Nasi. Rabbi Adin
Steinzaltz, a noted Talmudic scholar and a well-known Jewish
philosopher is the currently elected Nasi.
Some authorities have argued
that every single scholar in the Land of
Israel must be assembled in one place and give their consent at one
time in order to renew semichah, but other authorities state
that this was not the intention of Maimonides, or alternatively, that given the current
urgent situation the above method involving the consent of hundreds of
rabbis, scholars and leaders was acceptable. Some disagree entirely
with Maimonides, and
insist that we must wait for Eliyahu HaNavi to divinely
appear. To understand the halachic context of this teaching
of Maimonides, and the ruling of
the Shulchan Aruch, one must review the
responsa of the leading Rabbonim and Torah Sages involved in
the several attempts at re-establishment of the semichah during
the last
four hundred years. The current attempt to
re-establish the Sanhedrin is the sixth attempt in recent
history, but unlike
previous attempts, for the
first time there seems to be
wide
consensus among the
leading
Torah
sages living in the Land of Israel for the pressing need for such an
institution at this time. Support for such an institution has
only been increased due to various actions by the
State against the interests of the various religious communities.
Rabbi Dov Stein, the secretary for the Sanhedrin project, spoke with
Arutz-7 about the late Rabbi. "Without Rabbi Halberstam's efforts
toward renewing semicha, it would not have happened the way it
did," he
said. "By agreeing to be the first to be ordained, he took a serious
risk of being rejected and condemned by his community for taking part
in such a project. His ordination set the ball rolling for the
foundation of a Jewish legal body that seeks to eventually supersede
the Badatz [Hareidi Rabbinical court system]. But despite the
serious pressures put on him following his agreement and granting of semicha
to others, he never went back on it or even
tempered his
agreement with the act of renewing semicha." Recalling the
Rabbi
himself, from time spent with him, Rabbi Stein said, "He was a lover
of Israel, a soft person, always willing to listen, a man steeped in
the secrets of the kabbalah."
Further reading
Further
detailed information
on halachic issues is/will be available on the Hebrew website,
some summaries in English can be found here:
"Friends of the Sanhedrin" formally
invites scholars and experts to
participate in the discussions and provide much needed assistance by mail, fax, email
or forums.
This
is a unique opportunity that should not be wasted.
This website was
established by "Volunteers for the Sanhedrin Initiative Online" in
consultation with the nascent Sanhedrin.
It is authorized to distribute information. However the material
presented here has not necessarily been
reviewed by the Sanhedrin and may or may not represent the official
position of the Sanhedrin
Copyright © 2006-2008, All rights reserved.
webmaster@thesanhedrin.org
|